Why the study?
Does dual RAAS blockade compared to single RAAS blockade improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and heart failure?
Does dual RAAS blockade compared to single RAAS blockade improve cardiovascular outcomes in patients with hypertension and heart failure?
While dual RAAS blockade offers additive benefits in blood pressure reduction and heart failure, it is associated with increased side effects, necessitating further investigation on hard cardiovascular events.
Dual RAAS blockade should not yet change practice; leaves open net effects on hard cardiovascular outcomes.
Angiotensin II plays an important role in the cardiovascular continuum starting with risk factors and progressing to atherosclerosis, target organ damage, and ultimately to heart failure, stroke, or death. Inhibiting the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) represents a cornerstone for the treatment of hypertension and heart failure. In patients with heart failure, the single RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality, increase life expectancy, and preserve the renal function. AT1 receptor blockers (ARBs) are equally effective in reducing mortality and morbidity in patients with impaired left ventricular function. The combination of ACE inhibitors with ARBs leads to an additive blood pressure lowering effect, better reduction in proteinuria, and to additive benefits in heart failure and left ventricular hypertrophy. But combination therapy is also associated with more side effects. Further investigations evaluating the effect of dual RAAS blockade on fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events are needed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sudano et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: