Why the study?
Does the DI-MHD provide a valid and reliable assessment of depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared to the BDI?
Does the DI-MHD provide a valid and reliable assessment of depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients compared to the BDI?
The DI-MHD is a valid and reliable disease-specific self-report tool for screening depression in maintenance hemodialysis patients.
DI-MHD may aid depression screening in MHD; leaves open external validation before clinical adoption.
Patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) are subject to a higher-than-usual prevalence of depressive disorders. However, the lack of consensus regarding the best assessment method remains an important problem. Thus, there is a clear need for more effective screening tools and an easily administered, disease-specific self-report measure of depression in MHD patients. After we developed and administered an initial depression inventory for MHD patients (I-DI-MHD), we created the DI-MHD and administered the DI-MHD and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) to 354 patients from four hospitals. Reliability, construct validity and receiver operator characteristic curves were assessed. The 17-item DI-MHD instrument displayed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha =0.893), provided excellent convergent validity, and correlated with the BDI scale (kappa =0.785, P <0.001). A factor analysis pattern matrix analysis showed that a four-factor model provided the best account of the data. Finally, the DI-MHD cutoff yielded a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.86, which were slightly better than the corresponding values for the BDI. The DI-MHD scale shows reasonable validity and reliability for assessing depression in MHD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: