Why the study?
Do plasma levels of pro-BNP correlate with traditional markers and predict left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months in patients with STEMI?
Do plasma levels of pro-BNP correlate with traditional markers and predict left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months in patients with STEMI?
Increased concentrations of pro-BNP at initial presentation in STEMI patients correlate well with CPK and may serve as an indicator of long-term left ventricular dysfunction.
Background The circulating peptide, pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (pro-BNP) was examined for prediction of cardiac function and prognosis and compared with previously reported markers [cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and creatine phosphokinase (CPK)] in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods and Results We examined plasma levels of pro-BNP, cTnI, and CPK in 84 patients presenting with STEMI. Patients presenting with KILLIP9s class 3 and 4, renal failure, and a previous history of low ejection fraction (EF) were excluded. EF was determined by echocardiography 6 months after STEMI. Of the 84 patients in this study, 60 (71%) were male and 24 (29%) female. Their ages ranged from 43 to 88 yr, with a mean of 63.6 yr (SD 13.0 yr). The correlation between pro-BNP and CPK was excellent (r=.88, p < .001), while the following correlations were on the borderline of fair to moderate: pro- BNP and cTnI (r = .52, p < .001) and cTnI and CPK (r = .50, p < .001). Left ventricular ejection fraction at 6 months was moderately negatively correlated with peak CPK (r = 2.64, p < .001) and pro-BNP (r = 2.66, p < .001); its negative correlation with cTnI (r = 2.47, p < .001) was only fair. Conclusions We conclude that increased concentrations of pro-BNP at initial presentation of patients with STEMI correlate well with levels of CPK and the may reflect long-term left ventricular dysfunction in these patients. These data support the value of combining markers of hemodynamic stress with traditional approaches to risk assessment in acute myocardial infarction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Godkar et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: