Key result
Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet is linked to ~16% lower incident AF risk.
Cohort (n=24,713)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective cohort study shows reduced atrial fibrillation risk with EAT-Lancet diet adherence in adults, highlighting dietary benefits across genetic risk tiers.
BACKGROUND: The EAT-Lancet Commission proposed a global reference diet with both human health benefits and environmental sustainability in 2019. However, evidence regarding the association of such a diet with the risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) is lacking. In addition, whether the genetic risk of AF can modify the effect of diet on AF remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the association of the EAT-Lancet diet with the risk of incident AF and examine the interaction between the EAT-Lancet diet and genetic susceptibility of AF. METHODS: This prospective study included 24,713 Swedish adults who were free of AF, coronary events, and stroke at baseline. Dietary habits were estimated with a modified diet history method, and an EAT-Lancet diet index was constructed to measure the EAT-Lancet reference diet. A weighted genetic risk score was constructed using 134 variants associated with AF. Cox proportional hazards regression models were applied to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 22.9 years, 4617 (18.7%) participants were diagnosed with AF. The multivariable HR (95% CI) of AF for the highest versus the lowest group for the EAT-Lancet diet index was 0.84 (0.73, 0.98) (P for trend < 0.01). The HR (95% CI) of AF per one SD increment of the EAT-Lancet diet index for high genetic risk was 0.92 (0.87, 0.98) (P for interaction = 0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet index was significantly associated with a lower risk of incident AF. Such association tended to be stronger in participants with higher genetic risk, though gene-diet interaction was not significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Incident atrial fibrillation (n=24,713). EAT-Lancet diet index (highest adherence group) vs. EAT-Lancet diet index (lowest adherence group) was evaluated on Incident atrial fibrillation (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.98, p=<0.01 for trend). Greater adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet index was associated with a lower risk of incident atrial fibrillation (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.73-0.98; P for trend <0.01).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: