Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Let R be a commutative ring with identity. Various generalizations of prime ideals have been studied. For example, a proper ideal I of R is weakly prime (resp., almost prime) if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I − {0} (resp., ab ∈ I − I 2) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. Let φ:ℐ(R) → ℐ(R) ∪ {∅} be a function where ℐ(R) is the set of ideals of R. We call a proper ideal I of R a φ-prime ideal if a, b ∈ R with ab ∈ I − φ(I) implies a ∈ I or b ∈ I. So taking φ∅(J) = ∅ (resp., φ0(J) = 0, φ2(J) = J 2), a φ∅-prime ideal (resp., φ0-prime ideal, φ2-prime ideal) is a prime ideal (resp., weakly prime ideal, almost prime ideal). We show that φ-prime ideals enjoy analogs of many of the properties of prime ideals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anderson et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: