Why the study?
Does external fixation result in union in patients with femoral fractures?
Does external fixation result in union in patients with femoral fractures?
External fixation for femoral fractures achieves satisfactory union rates but is associated with a high risk of knee stiffness, particularly in distal fractures.
External fixation may achieve union in femoral fractures; leaves open functional outcomes and stiffness risks.
In this article we present the femoral fractures treated with external fixation in our clinic between 19881992. The operative indications of 29 patients with femoral fractures and the results of the 17 patients that had an average follow-up period of 9.2 months (range between 6-24 months) were retrospectively evaluated. 23 of the 29 cases were open fractures and we used the "Multi-purpose External Fixator" which is an adjustable type pin-clamp fixator designed in our clinic. We observed union in.16 of the 17 cases that had a satisfactory follow-up period. The complications were: 2 angulations, 1 osteomyelitis, and 4 pin-track infections and knee stiffness in 8 cases. With this technique in correspondance with the Iiterature, restriction of the knee joint motion is possible especially in the distal femoral fractures, but when we consider the results in the meaning of union, they are satisfactory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özbarlas et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: