Both creatinine- and cystatin C-based eGFR may be influenced by non-GFR factors; hypothesis-generating for confounding in cardiovascular risk prediction.
BACKGROUND: Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on either cystatin C or creatinine performs similarly in estimating measured GFR, but associate differently with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality. This could be due to confounding by non-GFR-related traits associated with cystatin C and creatinine levels. We investigated non-GFR-related associations between eGFR and two types of nontraditional risk factors for CVD and death: L-arginine/dimethylarginine metabolism and insulin resistance. METHODS: GFR was measured via iohexol clearance in a cross-sectional study of 1,624 middle-aged persons from the general population without CVD, diabetes or chronic kidney disease. The dimethylarginines were measured using liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MSMS). Insulin resistance was determined by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA), the L-arginine/ADMA ratio and insulin resistance were associated with creatinine-based eGFR after accounting for measured GFR in multivariable adjusted analyses. The cystatin C-based eGFR showed a similar residual association with SDMA; an oppositely directed, borderline significant association with ADMA; and a stronger residual association with insulin resistance compared with eGFR based on creatinine. CONCLUSION: Both creatinine- and cystatin C-based eGFR are influenced by nontraditional risk factors, which may bias risk prediction by eGFR in longitudinal studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melsom et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: