Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of the research was to examine and analyze decision number 47/Pdt.G/LH/2018/PN Cbi regarding lawsuits against experts. This research used normative research, with a case and statutory approach and grammatical and systematic interpretation. As for the research results, the lawsuit was rejected by the Panel of Judges based on Decision No: 47/Pdt.G/2018/PN.Cbi. The reason the panel of judges rejected the lawsuit was because it did not include relative competence, but interestingly one of the rulings was written "that experts in the future should have the right not to be prosecuted criminally" Of course this supports the importance of experts being given the right to immunity. So that in the future the government and legislature will regulate the right to immunity for experts in the Witness and Victim Protection Law.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mansyah et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 9 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: