Why the study?
Does the use of reversed saphenous veins improve graft patency compared to femoral or internal mammary arteries in dogs undergoing ascending aorta-coronary bypass?
Does the use of reversed saphenous veins improve graft patency compared to femoral or internal mammary arteries in dogs undergoing ascending aorta-coronary bypass?
This early experimental study demonstrated the superiority of reversed saphenous vein grafts for ascending aorta-coronary bypass and established key technical principles for the procedure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Animal data support vein grafts in experimental bypass; leaves open human translation without clinical validation.
In 25 dogs ascending aorta-coronary bypass techniques were compared by use of femoral arteries in seven, internal mammary arteries in six, and reversed saphenous veins in twelve. In those animals available for long-term studies the veins were open in eight out of nine, the femoral artery grafts were open in one of four, and the internal mammary arteries were open in two of five. Histologic studies confirmed the adequacy or superiority of the vein grafts. Other conclusions drawn from these experiments were (1) that the saphenous vein bypass should originate from the ascending aorta; (2) that each bypass should have a separate aortic origin; (3) that an arrested quiet heart by means of extracorporeal circulation is necessary for satisfactory distal vein-coronary artery anastomosis; and (4) that the heart is best protected during arrest with ice slush.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akio Wakabayashi (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: