Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In order to study the reactivity pattern of Mo−O t bonds associated with anionic sulfur ligands, precursor complexes MoO 2 L·D (H 2 L = S -methyl 3-(2-hydroxyphenyl)methylenedithiocarbazate; D = CH 3 OH ( 1 ), H 2 O ( 2 )) were synthesized. Complex 2 crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P 2 1 2 1 2 1, with a = 6.079(1) Å, b = 11.638(2) Å, c = 17.325(2) Å, V = 1225.7(4) Å 3, and Z = 4. In its reaction with PhNHOH, 1 forms a seven-coordinate oxaziridine compound [MoO(η 2 -ONPh)L·CH 3 OH] ( 3 ) by oxo-rearrangement (elimination−substitution) without a change in the molybdenum oxidation state. The crystal data for 3 are a = 9.573(3) Å, b = 9.859(2) Å, c = 10.604(3) Å, α = 95.90(2)°, β = 95.81(2)°, γ = 112.12(2)°, V = 911.5(4) Å 3, Z = 2, and triclinic space group P 1̄. In contrast to that of the precursor compound 1 (Mo−O t = 1.700(4) Å), the terminal Mo−O t distance in 3 (1.668(2) Å) is typical of Mo−O bonds of order 3, which drives the formation of an apparently unstable three-membered metallacycle via spectator oxo stabilization (Rappé, A. K.; Goddard, W. A., III. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1982, 104, 448). With thioglycolic acid, 1 undergoes an oxo-transfer reaction through a coupled electron−proton transfer mechanism involving two steps, each having first-order dependence on H 2 tga concentration. The system offers an interesting reactivity model for the oxo-transfer pathway of oxidoreductase Mo enzymes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dutta et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: