Key result
Image-navigated CMRA detects obstructive CAD with ~86% sensitivity and 83% specificity compared with invasive angiography.
Observational (n=31)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The use of coronary MR angiography (CMRA) in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) remains limited due to the long scan times, unpredictable and often non-diagnostic image quality secondary to respiratory motion artifacts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate CMRA with image-based respiratory navigation (iNAV CMRA) and compare it to gold standard invasive x-ray coronary angiography in patients with CAD. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for CMR assessment were included to undergo iNAV CMRA on a 1.5 T scanner. Coronary vessel sharpness and a visual score were assigned to the coronary arteries. A diagnostic reading was performed on the iNAV CMRA data, where a lumen narrowing >50% was considered diseased. This was compared to invasive x-ray findings. RESULTS: Image-navigated CMRA was performed in 31 patients (77% male, 56 ± 14 years). The iNAV CMRA scan time was 7 min:21 s ± 0 min:28 s. Out of a possible 279 coronary segments, 26 segments were excluded from analysis due to stents or diameter less than 1.5 mm, resulting in a total of 253 coronary segments. Diagnostic image quality was obtained for 98% of proximal coronary segments, 94% of middle segments, and 91% of distal coronary segments. The sensitivity and specificity was 86% and 83% per patient, 80% and 92% per vessel and 73% and 95% per segment. CONCLUSION: In this study, iNAV CMRA offered a very good diagnostic performance when compared against invasive x-ray angiography. Due to the short and predictable scan time it can add clinical value as a part of a comprehensive CAD assessment protocol.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Henningsson et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=31). Image-based respiratory navigation coronary MR angiography (iNAV CMRA) vs. Invasive x-ray coronary angiography was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) for detecting coronary lumen narrowing >50%. Image-navigated CMRA demonstrated 86% sensitivity and 83% specificity per patient compared with invasive x-ray coronary angiography for detecting CAD (>50% lumen narrowing).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: