Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 20, 2011Journal of Magnetic Resonance ImagingOpen Access

Diagnosis of colorectal hepatic metastases: Comparison of contrast‐enhanced CT, contrast‐enhanced US, superparamagnetic iron oxide‐enhanced MRI, and gadoxetic acid‐enhanced MRI

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

AMAli MuhiUniversity of Yamanashi HospitalTITomoaki IchikawaGunma UniversityUMUtaroh MotosugiUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Muhi et al. (2011) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a72371a5d37378ac1df15eehttps://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22613
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence.1996 · 308 citations
  2. 2Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd-EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging.1995 · 573 citations
  3. 3Hepatic Metastases: Detection with Multi–Detector Row CT, SPIO-enhanced MR Imaging, and Both Techniques Combined2006 · 74 citations