A comparative study of the hyperfine interactions in the X 2Σ+ state of TiN and the X 3Δ state of TiO has been performed. The 48Ti14N(I=1) hyperfine structure was determined from the analysis of 19 components of the N=1–0 and N=2–1 pure rotational transitions recorded using the pump/probe microwave-optical double resonance technique. The 47Ti(I=5/2) hyperfine structure of X 2Σ+ TiN was determined from an analysis of the high resolution optical spectrum of the (0,0) A 2Π3/2–X 2Σ+ band system. The resulting parameters are (in MHz) B(48Ti14N)=18 589.3513(13), D(48Ti14N)=0.026 31(18), γ(48Ti14N)=−52.2070(13), bF(N)=18.480(3), c(N)=0.166(7), eQq0(N)=−1.514(8), CI(N)=0.0137(12), bF(47Ti) =−558.8(11), c(47Ti)=−15(5), and eQq0(47Ti)=62(16). An analysis of the (0,0) band of the B 3Π–X 3Δ system of 47Ti16O produced the X 3Δ hyperfine parameters (in MHz): a(47Ti) =−54.7(21), (bF+2c/3)(47Ti)=−231.6(60), and eQq0(47Ti)=−49(31). An interpretation based upon the predicted nature of the bonding in TiO and TiN is given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fletcher et al. (1993) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: