Why the study?
The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants in frail elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease have not been fully established.
Does moderate CKD stage (GFR <60 vs ≥60) influence the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in frail elderly patients with NVAF?
Does moderate CKD stage (GFR <60 vs ≥60) influence the safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in frail elderly patients with NVAF?
Similar event rates by GFR do not indicate differential OAC risk; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice in frail elderly NVAF.
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness and safety of oral anticoagulants (OACs) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) in frail elderly patients have not been fully established. We aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of OACs in frail elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stage II-III CKD. METHODS: Frail elderly patients ≥65 years with AF and CKD who received OAC from January 2022 to June 2024 were retrospectively identified. Primary endpoints were composite of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism (IS/SE), and composite of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and/or gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. Secondary endpoints included any bleeding. RESULTS: -VASc score was nonsignificant (2.6 ± 1.01 vs. 2.8 ± 0.89, p value 0.054), for GFR ≥60 and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 patients, respectively. HAS-BLED score (1.9 ± 0.67 vs. 2.3 ± 0.70, p value 0.071) for GFR ≥60 and GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 patients respectively. While the observed incidence of ICH/GI bleeding was numerically higher in patients with GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, Cox proportional hazards regression did not demonstrate a statistically significant difference in hazard between the groups. The incidence of composite IS/SE was 8.5% in GFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus 8.7% in GFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR 1.02, 95% CI: 0.60-1.74, p = 0.24). Composite ICH/GI bleeding occurred in 7.1% versus 9.3% (HR 2.15, 95% CI: 0.91-4.56, p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: In this study comparing frail elderly patients with NVAF and CKD stage II versus stage III receiving OACs, we observed no significant difference in the risk of IS/SE or ICH/GI bleeding between groups. These findings suggest that within moderate CKD (eGFR 30-89 mL/min), renal function stage may not independently influence OAC-related outcomes when anticoagulation is well managed. Our results may not generalize to less frail populations or those with advanced CKD. Further prospective studies with larger sample size are needed to provide clearer guidance on the optimal use of OACs in this challenging clinical scenario.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qutub et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: