Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A. Chapman-Ferraro’s theory of magnetic storms is discussed. It is pointed out that the fundamental assumption about a non-magnetized beam is in conflict with cosmic ray evidence. It is further shown that there is a fundamental objection against any theory of the main phase based on a non-magnetized beam.B. The objections, which Cowling and Chapman have raised against the electric field theory, are discussed, and the discharge mechanism during a magnetic storm is analysed. When a magnetized beam enters the earth’s magnetic field, it is heated due to the compression. In the hot plasma the earth will act as a “probe” so that it gets a negative charge in relation to the plasma. As a result of ambipolar diffusion to the earth, the ionosphere in the auroral zones will be bombarded by high energy protons and electrons.It is shown that a mechanism of this type is not subject to the objections which have been raised.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannes Alfvén (1958) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: