Why the study?
Does moderate to severe traumatic brain injury affect the ability to anticipate consequences of actions and its relation to cortical thickness in adolescents?
Does moderate to severe traumatic brain injury affect the ability to anticipate consequences of actions and its relation to cortical thickness in adolescents?
Adolescents with moderate-severe TBI show deficits in anticipating long-term consequences of actions, which correlates differently with cortical thickness in social cognition regions compared to typically developing peers.
TBI may impair long-term consequence anticipation in adolescents; hypothesis-generating for cortical thickness links, needing prospective validation before practice change.
For this pilot study, we compared performance of 15 adolescents with moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) to that of 13 typically developing (TD) adolescents in predicting social actions and consequences for avatars in a virtual microworld environment faced with dilemmas involving legal or moral infractions. Performance was analyzed in relation to cortical thickness in brain regions implicated in social cognition. Groups did not differ in number of actions predicted nor in reasons cited for predictions when presented only the conflict situation. After viewing the entire scenario, including the choice made by the avatar, TD and TBI adolescents provided similar numbers of short-term consequences. However, TD adolescents provided significantly more long-term consequences (p = .010). Additionally, for the Overall qualitative score, TD adolescents' responses were more likely to reflect the long-term impact of the decision made (p = .053). Groups differed in relation of the Overall measure to thickness of right medial prefrontal cortex/frontal pole and precuneus, with stronger relations for the TD group (p < .01). For long-term consequences, the relations to the posterior cingulate, superior medial frontal, and precentral regions, and to a lesser extent, the middle temporal region, were stronger for the TBI group (p < .01).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cook et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: