Why the study?
Does oesophageal cooling with ice water prevent oesophageal lesions in patients with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Does oesophageal cooling with ice water prevent oesophageal lesions in patients with drug-resistant atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation?
Oesophageal cooling with ice water during atrial fibrillation ablation does not reduce the incidence of oesophageal lesions, though it may slightly reduce their severity.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Oesophageal cooling with ice water does not prevent lesions in AF ablation; does not support routine use and directs research to alternative strategies.
AIM: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation can result in oesophageal injuries that lead to atrio-oesophageal fistulae, a life-threatening complication. This study aimed to evaluate whether oesophageal cooling could prevent oesophageal lesions complicating AF ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 100 patients with drug-resistant AF to an oesophageal cooling group or a control group. In the oesophageal cooling group, we injected 5 mL of ice water into the oesophagus prior to radiofrequency (RF) energy delivery adjacent to the oesophagus. If the oesophageal temperature reached 42°C, the RF energy delivery was stopped, and the ice water injection was repeated. In the control group, oesophageal cooling was not applied. Oesophageal endoscopy was performed 1 day after the catheter ablation, and lesions were qualitatively assessed as mild, moderate, or severe. The numbers of ablation sites with an oesophageal temperature of >42°C were 1.7 ± 1.4 and 2.6 ± 1.7 in the oesophageal cooling group and the control group, respectively (P = 0.04), and the maximal oesophageal temperature at those sites was 43.0 ± 0.6 and 44.7 ± 0.9°C (P < 0.0001). Oesophageal lesions occurred almost equally between the oesophageal cooling group [10 of 50 patients (20%)] and the control group [11 of 50 patients (22%)]. However, the severity of the oesophageal lesions was slightly milder in the oesophageal cooling group (three moderate, seven mild) than in the control group (three severe, one moderate, seven mild). CONCLUSION: Oesophageal cooling may alleviate the severity of oesophageal lesions but does not reduce the incidence of this complication under the specific protocol evaluated here.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuwahara et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: