Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To determine the usefulness of positron emission tomography with fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (PET-FDG) in assessing mediastinal disease in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to compare its yield to that of computed tomography (CT), we performed a prospective consecutive sample investigation in a university hospital and its related clinics. In 30 patients with NSCLC with clinical stage I (T1-2, NO, MO) disease, we compared the results of chest CT and PET-FDG with the findings at surgical exploration of the mediastinum. Seven (77%) of nine patients with surgically proven mediastinal metastasis were identified by the PET-FDG results, with four false-positives in 21 patients with negative lymph node dissections (p = 0.004). Using the results of pathologic examination of mediastinal lymph nodes as the criterion standard, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) for PET-FDG imaging of mediastinal metastases were 78%, 81%, 80%, 64%, and 89%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV for chest CT in the detection of mediastinal metastasis were 56%, 86%, 77%, 63%, and 87%, respectively. CT and PET-FDG results agreed in 21 patients. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined imaging modalities was 90%. We concluded that mediastinal uptake of FDG correlates with the extent of mediastinal involvement of NSCLC and may contribute to preoperative staging. PET-FDG imaging complements chest CT in the noninvasive evaluation of NSCLC, and strategies for its use merit further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chin et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: