Why the study?
The study evaluated the impact of pandemic lockdown, including training cessation and home-based training, on physical performance in professional soccer players according to playing position.
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce physical match performance in professional soccer players?
Does the COVID-19 lockdown reduce physical match performance in professional soccer players?
The COVID-19 lockdown and subsequent training restrictions negatively impacted the high-intensity running performance of professional soccer players upon season resumption.
Lockdown-related performance drops warrant cautious return-to-play protocols; leaves open position-specific mitigation for future interruptions.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic lockdown, which included training cessation and home-based training, on physical performance in professional soccer players from the Polish Ekstraklasa according to their playing position. The research was based on 3137 players' individual match performance observations during the 2019/2020 season divided into before (26 matchdays) and after (11 matchdays) lockdown periods. The data were collected using the computerised multiple-camera optical tracking system TRACAB (ChryronHego VID, New York, NY) with a sampling frequency of 25 Hz. Independently of playing position, a significant (p < 0.001) reduction in season resumption metrics of total distance (-0.9%), jogging (-1.6%), running (-3.4%) and high-speed running (-2.5%), with a contemporaneous increase in walking distance (1.4%), was noted in relation to pre-lockdown performance. A reduction in high-speed running was observed in central defenders (p < 0.05), central midfielders (p < 0.01) and forwards (p < 0.05). No significant decrease in sprinting or maximal running velocity was observed. The COVID-19 lockdown negatively influenced the physical performance in professional soccer players.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Radzimiński et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: