Why the study?
Does irrigated contact-force sensing catheter ablation improve outcomes and safety for redo ablation of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients?
Population
Pediatric and adolescent patients undergoing redo ablation for slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant…
Comparison
Irrigated contact-force sensing catheter ablation vs Conventional nonirrigated radiofrequency…
Design
Editorial
Authors
Loading...
Irrigated contact-force sensing catheters may be a beneficial alternative for redo AVNRT ablation in pediatric and adolescent patients when conventional methods fail, though cryoablation or nonirrigated RF remains the safest approach for very young children.
Does irrigated contact-force sensing catheter ablation improve outcomes and safety for redo ablation of slow-fast atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in pediatric and adolescent patients?
Irrigated contact-force sensing catheters may be a beneficial alternative for redo AVNRT ablation in pediatric and adolescent patients when conventional methods fail, though cryoablation or nonirrigated RF remains the safest approach for very young children.
Pi‐Chang Lee (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: