Why the study?
Novel structural heart procedures offer life-saving treatment advantages, but little is known about pre-procedural barriers to care by race/ethnicity.
Does race/ethnicity affect access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system?
Does race/ethnicity affect access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) among patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Veterans Affairs healthcare system?
No significant racial or ethnic inequities in TAVR access were detected within the VA system after adjusting for age and comorbidities, though many eligible patients missed treatment due to refusal or loss to follow-up.
Highlights potential racial disparities in TAVR access; leaves open whether targeted interventions improve equity in severe aortic stenosis.
Novel structural heart procedures offer life-saving treatment advantages, yet little is known about pre-procedural barriers to care by race/ethnicity. All echocardiograms performed at a Veterans Affairs hospital from 2015 to 2019 were reviewed to identify patients with severe aortic stenosis and their access to transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) by race/ethnicity. From 19,403 echocardiograms, 355 individuals were identified to have severe aortic stenosis (72.6% White, 9.8% Hispanic, 3.9% Black). There was a non-significant trend towards increased TAVR treatment among White compared to non-White patients (OR 2.02, CI 0.96–4.24, p = 0.063), which attenuated after adjustment for age and comorbidities. Reasons for not undergoing replacement included poor procedural candidacy (25.3%), loss of follow-up (17.8%), and patient refusal (16.4%). Racial/ethnic inequities were not detected in novel structural heart treatment within the VA. However, a high proportion of eligible patients did not receive procedural treatment due to patient refusal or loss of follow-up, highlighting barriers that require further study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kerkar et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: