Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
On agricultural soils, short rotation coppices (SRC) can be an efficient alternative for long-term carbon fixation in roots compared to conventional land-uses. Previous studies on root biomass focused mainly on fine roots or topsoil layers, but a comprehensive assessment requires accounting for total root biomass across both topsoil and subsoil. Three plots of a poplar SRC with rotation length of 2, 4 and 16 years (SRC2, SRC4 and SRC16) were studied to assess total root biomass (finer <7 cm and coarser >7 cm), its distribution down to 1 m depth, and the root decomposition rates 12 and 24 months after re-conversion. The objective of this study was to quantify the relevance and persistence of carbon stocks from SRC root biomass after re-conversion. Total root biomass was 66.53 Mg ha −1 (SRC16), 37.90 Mg ha −1 (SRC4) and 30.24 Mg ha −1 (SRC2), which equals 23.13 Mg C ha −1 (SRC16), 15.49 Mg C ha −1 (SRC4) and 12.39 Mg C ha −1 (SRC2). Most biomass was stored in roots <7 cm, but coarser root residues were still relevant with 12.90 Mg ha −1 (SRC16), 2.11 Mg ha −1 (SRC4), and 3.31 Mg ha −1 (SRC2), especially for the longest rotation. Fifty percent of the subsoil-C stayed stable within 24 months. The observed decrease in decay rate, shows the mid-to long-term effect of carbon storage even after re-cultivation. Coarser roots were more resilient to mineralization than finer roots due to a smaller relative reactive surface and a higher C:N ratio. In conclusion, not only aboveground SRC yield contributes the SRC carbon sink effect, but also belowground biomass, which can be seen by comparison with root studies from forests and grasslands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiege et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: