Key result
Unstable angina is linked to ~14-fold higher plaque S100A8/A9 area compared with stable angina.
Cross-Sectional (n=92)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND: The S100A8/A9 complex is expressed in a subset of activated neutrophils and macrophages in acute inflammatory lesions associated with various diseases. OBJECTIVE: To investigate (a) whether serum S100A8/A9 levels are increased in patients with unstable angina (UA); and (b) whether S100A8/A9 expression is upregulated in coronary atherosclerotic plaques of patients with UA. DESIGN: Serum S100A8/A9 levels in 39 patients with stable angina (SA) and 53 patients with UA were measured. In addition, the presence of the S100A8/A9 complex in directional coronary atherectomy specimens was studied immunohistochemically. Cell types which stain positive for S100A8/A9 were identified by immunodouble staining with neutrophils and macrophages. RESULTS: Mean (SD) serum S100A8/A9 levels were significantly higher in patients with UA than in those with SA (3.25 (3.08) microg/ml vs 0.77 (0.31) microg/ml, p<0.05). In patients with UA, immunodouble staining clearly showed that the S100A8/A9 complex was expressed in infiltrated neutrophils and occasional macrophages. The S100A8/A9-positive area was significantly higher in UA than in SA (mean (SD) 18.3 (14.2)% vs 1.3 (2.4)%, respectively, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The S100A8/A9 complex may be involved in the inflammatory process of coronary atherosclerotic plaques in patients with UA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miyamoto et al. (2008) conducted a cross-sectional in Unstable angina and stable angina (n=92). Unstable angina vs. Stable angina was evaluated on Serum S100A8/A9 levels (microg/ml) and S100A8/A9-positive plaque area (%) (p=<0.001). Unstable angina was associated with higher serum S100A8/A9 and plaque S100A8/A9-positive area than stable angina.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: