Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SETTING: Philadelphia, PA, USA. OBJECTIVES: To compare the evaluation and treatment of latent tuberculous infection (LTBI) in refugees seen at member clinics of the Philadelphia Refugee Health Collaborative (PRHC) vs. non-PRHC clinics. DESIGN: Refugees with Class B (non-communicable) tuberculosis (TB) admitted to the United States from 2010 to 2012 who were being treated at PRHC clinics were compared to those treated at non-PRHC clinics. Odds ratios (ORs) for attending a follow-up appointment, completing treatment, and time from arrival to the United States to the first TB screening test were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 2094 refugees who arrived in Philadelphia in 2010-2012, the Philadelphia Department of Public Health was notified of 149 who required additional evaluation for TB. Among these, 57 (38.3%) were confirmed to have LTBI, and none were diagnosed with active TB. All LTBI cases were recommended for anti-tuberculosis prophylaxis and 43 (75.4%) completed treatment. Refugees receiving care from PRHC clinics were more likely to be screened within 30 days of arrival (OR 4.70, 95%CI 2.12-10.44), attend a follow-up appointment (OR 4.53, 95%CI 1.36-16.27), and complete treatment (OR 9.44, 95%CI 2.39-37.3). CONCLUSION: Refugees who attended PRHC clinics were more likely to be evaluated promptly and to complete LTBI treatment. The PRHC clinics serve as a model for communities seeking to improve refugee health care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Subedi et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: