Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An economic evaluation was undertaken alongside a multi-centre international trial of basiliximab. Resource usage within the trial was assessed, and the cost implications of using basiliximab evaluated. Recipients of a primary cadaveric kidney transplant were recruited into a double-blind trial and received either placebo (n= 186) or basiliximab (n= 190). Clinical outcomes and resource usage were monitored in the 12 months following transplantation. Local unit costs were obtained, and global analysis was undertaken using health sector purchasing-power parity rates. No statistically significant differences were found in the mean cost of treatment per patient. The mean cost of treatment was $47,940 for basiliximab patients and $46,280 for placebo patients, a mean difference of $1,660 (95% confidence interval (CI): −$4,150, $7,360; P= 0.58). Basiliximab produces clinical benefit in terms of preventing episodes of acute rejection, whilst the difference in the total resource usage and cost of treatment is not statistically significant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chilcott et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: