Why the study?
To assess patient-reported experiences and perceived respiratory outcomes of home-based deep breathing exercises 3 months after cardiac surgery.
Does home-based deep breathing exercises improve patient-reported respiratory outcomes and experiences in patients after cardiac surgery?
Does home-based deep breathing exercises improve patient-reported respiratory outcomes and experiences in patients after cardiac surgery?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports feasibility of home breathing exercises after cardiac surgery; leaves open efficacy for respiratory outcomes in randomized trials.
This study assessed patient-reported experiences and perceived respiratory outcomes of home-based deep breathing exercises 3 months after cardiac surgery. A postal questionnaire was sent to 120 patients at a Swedish university hospital, with 92 respondents (77%). The majority (89%) performed breathing exercises after discharge, with 77% reporting them as very easy to perform. Most patients continued the exercises for 2 to 4 weeks (41%) or 1 to 2 months (20%), typically practicing 3 times per day. The exercises were well tolerated, with 87% experiencing no discomfort. Motivation was generally high-43% felt very motivated, and 78% found the exercises useful. While chest pain was reported as low and 56% experienced improved breathing, nearly half of the respondents reported difficulties with coughing, and 10% sought medical care for respiratory infections. Overall, home-based deep breathing exercises were perceived as beneficial and well accepted. However, engagement and adherence varied, highlighting the need for tailored support to encourage sustained participation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Westerdahl et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: