Why the study?
Does rescue radiofrequency ablation safely and effectively treat electrical storm in a pregnant patient with ARVD/C?
Does rescue radiofrequency ablation safely and effectively treat electrical storm in a pregnant patient with ARVD/C?
Rescue radiofrequency ablation using 3D electroanatomic mapping with near-zero fluoroscopy is a feasible and safe therapeutic option for electrical storm in pregnant patients with ARVD/C.
Rescue RFCA may be feasible for electrical storm in pregnant ARVD/C; leaves open need for prospective confirmation before wider use.
BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency ablation (RFCA) became a treatment of choice in patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, and appropriate interventions of implanted cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), however, electrical storm (ES) ablation in a pregnant woman has not yet been reported. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a case of a successful rescue ablation of recurrent ES in a 26-year-old Caucasian woman during her first pregnancy (23rd week). The arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy (ARVD/C) was diagnosed 3 years earlier and several drugs as well as 2 ablations failed to control recurrences of ventricular tachycardia. RFCA was performed on the day of the third electric storm. The use of electroanatomic mapping allowed very low X-ray exposure, and after applications in the right ventricular outflow tract, arrhythmia disappeared. Three months after ablation, a healthy girl was delivered without any complications. During twelve-month follow-up there was no recurrence of ventricular tachycardia or ICD interventions. CONCLUSIONS: This case documents the first successful RFCA during ES due to recurrent unstable ventricular arrhythmias in a patient with ARVD/C in pregnancy. Current guidelines recommend metoprolol, sotalol and intravenous amiodarone for prevention of recurrent ventricular tachycardia in pregnancy, however, RFCA should be considered as a therapeutic option in selected cases. The use of 3D navigating system and near zero X-ray approach is associated with minimal radiation exposure for mother and fetus as well as low risk of procedural complication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stec et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: