Why the study?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small anatomy?
Does transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) improve outcomes compared to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small anatomy?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
TAVI with newer generation lower profile systems is advantageous over SAVR in patients with severe aortic stenosis and small anatomy due to reduced prosthesis-patient mismatch.
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) has become a standard treatment for severe aortic stenosis. Although this technique has reached relative maturity, further optimisation of patient selection and device implantation is essential to improve prognosis. Smaller body size is a predictor of a challenging TAVI procedure due to specific anatomical difficulty and adverse events including annulus rupture, acute coronary obstruction and vascular complications. A newer generation, lower profile TAVI system is useful for patients with smaller anatomy. Moreover, TAVI is superior to surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with a narrowing annulus because this treatement has a low incidence of prosthesis-patient mismatch.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakashima et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: