Key result
Regionalised cardiogenic shock networks optimise rapid triage and multidisciplinary care for acute MI.
Why the study?
Cardiogenic shock complicating acute MI remains associated with high mortality and morbidity despite advances in coronary revascularisation and mechanical circulatory support. Outcomes depend on the organisation of care alongside individual therapies, yet variations in transfer criteria, hub-spoke organisation, and limitations in current evidence persist across dedicated shock centres and regionalised network models.
This state-of-the-art review examines the role of dedicated cardiogenic shock centres and regionalised hub-and-spoke networks in improving the diagnosis, triage, and multidisciplinary management of acute MI-related cardiogenic shock.
Regional CS networks may improve AMI-CS triage; leaves open optimal centre criteria and mortality impact in prospective studies.
Cardiogenic shock (CS) complicating acute MI (AMI-CS) remains associated with high mortality and morbidity, despite advances in coronary revascularisation and mechanical circulatory support (MCS). Outcomes are determined not only by individual therapies, but also by the organisation of care, with current guidelines emphasising multidisciplinary, system-level approaches to enable rapid diagnosis, triage and treatment. This review examines how CS centres function within regional networks of care. We review definitions of AMI-CS, including haemodynamic, clinical and biochemical markers and their application to early identification and triage. We summarise key components of centre-based management, including revascularisation, invasive haemodynamic assessment, selective MCS use and post-percutaneous coronary intervention critical care. Contemporary data from dedicated CS centres and regionalised network models are compared, highlighting variations in transfer criteria and hub–spoke organisation alongside limitations in current evidence. The distinct phenotypic nuances of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest-associated CS are discussed and gaps in evidence with future perspectives are highlighted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeyaprakash et al. (2026) conducted a review in Acute MI-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS). Cardiogenic shock centres and regionalised networks of care was evaluated. Cardiogenic shock centres and regionalised networks are examined in this review regarding their role in rapid diagnosis, triage, and multidisciplinary management of acute MI-related cardiogenic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: