Why the study?
Can a discriminant scoring system predict responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone treatment in children with idiopathic short stature?
Can a discriminant scoring system predict responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone treatment in children with idiopathic short stature?
A simple discriminant scoring system using height velocity and bone age standard deviation scores can accurately predict short-term growth response to growth hormone therapy in children with idiopathic short stature.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid GH trial selection in idiopathic short stature; leaves open larger prospective validation before clinical use.
A discriminant scoring system, using multivariate analysis, has been developed for pretreatment prediction of responsiveness to a 6-month trial of growth hormone (GH) treatment in short children with subnormal growth velocity, but without GH deficiency. Inclusion criteria included a birth weight above 2.5 kg, height below the 3rd centile for chronological age, height velocity below the 25th centile for bone age, no signs of puberty, a maximal GH response to pharmacological stimulation of above 10 micrograms/l and treatment with GH at a dose of 12-16 IU/m2/week. Children with an increase in height velocity greater than 2.5 cm/year after therapy were considered to be responders. Pretreatment clinical data from 67 patients were employed in a discriminant analysis in order to establish the model. The scoring system developed was as follows: score = -0.4 + 0.92X1 - 0.87X2, where X1 is the height velocity SD score (SDS) for chronological age, and X2 is the bone age SDS for chronological age. This model had a specificity of 96.3% and a sensitivity of 92.5% in predicting the responsiveness to GH. The model has subsequently been applied to a group of 14 patients in order to establish its validity; in this group its sensitivity was 83.3% and its specificity 100%. These preliminary data suggest that the model can be used as a guideline for selecting short, slowly growing, non-GH-deficient children who will respond to short-term GH therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spagnoli et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: