Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores an emerging “cultural turn” in intelligence studies, which, if fully realized, could entail the expansion of the discipline to include new methodologies and theories, and a more integrative understanding of historical causality that locates intelligence agencies within the widersocio-cultural domain they inhabit. It has two parts. The firstexpands upon what I mean by a new ‘integrative’ understanding of historical causality. The second explores three areas of interest for intelligence scholars where the “cultural turn” has clear and important implications: the study of secrecy, publicity, and “mentalities”.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Simon Willmetts (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: