Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The mechanisms of some fragmentation of methionine upon Curie‐point pyrolysis have been studied by the use of deuterium labelling. They lead to products having the same nominal mass but essentially different elemental compositions compared with ions generated by electron impact on methionine. For exaple, upon pyrolysis the product with mass 116 is due to a 1,2 elimination of hydroxylamine from the title compound, whereas upon electron impact the ion with m / e 116 is generated by successive loss of a molecule of water and of a methyl radical from the molecular ion; the generated of product m / e 101 proceeds via successive loss of a molecule of water, carbon monoxide and of hydrogen upon pyrolysis, but via a one‐step elimination of methanethiol upon electron impact. No evidence has been found for a diketopiperazine formation by a bimolecular process upon pyrolysis, although this type of reaction is well known for α‐amino acids.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Posthumus et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: