The manner in which the political system responds to external economic shocks in developing countries is a key determinant of the private investment response. We look at a simple model of political-economic equilibrium to make this intuition more precise, and developed the idea of a ‘political transmission mechanism’. Even in the confines of this simple model, we find that ambiguities abound: domestic politics can magnify or dampen the effect of the external shock. In our empirical work, we find that a high level of urbanization magnifies the investment reduction in response to an external shock. This is consistent with the supposition that high levels of urbanization are conductive to distributive politics with pernicious economic effects. We also find that the provision of political rights is conductive to superior private investment behavior.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özler et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: