Why the study?
Does a machine learning-based model improve the prediction of in-hospital cardiac events compared to traditional risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
Does a machine learning-based model improve the prediction of in-hospital cardiac events compared to traditional risk scores in patients with acute coronary syndrome?
A machine learning model using clinical, biological, and echocardiographic features at admission significantly outperforms traditional risk scores in predicting in-hospital cardiac events in ACS patients.
ML models may enhance ACS event prediction from admission data; leaves open prospective validation before clinical use.
Background Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. However, the accuracy of current prediction tools for in-hospital cardiac events after an ACS remains insufficient for individualized patient management strategies. Purpose To assess in patients with ACS the feasibility and accuracy of machine learning (ML)-based model using all data available at admission to predict in-hospital cardiac events. Methods We conducted a sub-study of ADDICT-ICCU registry, an observational prospective study including all consecutive patients admitted to intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) in 39 centres throughout France between 7 and 22 April 2021. We evaluated 16 clinical, 4 biological and 6 transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) features. ML involved automated feature selection with model building by random forest (RF), and then hyperparameter tuning was done by repeated cross-validation. The primary outcome was the occurrence of composite outcomes defined by death, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock requiring medical and/or mechanical haemodynamic support. Results Of 1,499 consecutive patients, 765 (mean age 63±15 years, 70% male) were admitted for ACS. The overall in-hospital cardiac events rate for ACS patients was 4.0 %. Feature selection was performed using RF with the log-rank–based variable importance, and 6 of the available features at admission were selected for the RF model (1 clinical, 1 biological, and 4 from TTE) including mean blood pressure, renal function, cardiac output, filling pressures, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and pulmonary arterial systolic pressure. The ML model exhibited a higher area under the curve compared with TIMI score, GRACE score, and traditional stepwise model score for prediction of in-hospital cardiac events (ML score: 0.96 vs TIMI: 0.54, GRACE: 0.68, traditional stepwise score: 0.87; all P < 0.001). Conclusions The ML-model exhibited a higher prognostic value to predict in-hospital cardiac events compared with all traditional scores. ML model for MACEs prediction ML model performance (AUC)
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gall et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: