Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Abstract (±)‐cis‐Chrysanthemic acid is readily lactonized in boiling dilute sulphuric acid to the crystalline (±)‐cis‐dihydrochrysanthemo‐δD‐lactone. The lactone ring is opened by alkali hydrolysis and a derivative of the (±)‐cis‐δD‐hydroxydihydrochrysanthemic acid is obtained. With methanolic sulphuric acid the lactone ring is opened to give mainly methyl (±)‐cis‐±‐methoxydihydrochrysanthemate together with methyl (±)‐cis‐chrysanthemate. In contrast, (±)‐trans‐chrysanthemic acid is converted under similar conditions into the crystalline (±)‐trans‐δ‐hydroxydihydrochrysanthemic acid. The mechanisms of these reactions and their bearing on the Seil and the Wilcoxon–Holaday methods of pyrethrum assay are discussed. On heating at 300° C. in sealed tubes (±)‐cis‐and (±)‐trans‐chrysanthemic acids and (±)‐cis‐dihydrochrysanthemo‐δ‐lactone are converted into an isomeric crystalline lactone, (±)‐pyrocin. This is shown by oxidative degradation not to be a dihydrochrysanthemo‐lactone but to be (±)‐β‐isobutenylisohexano‐σ‐lactone. These lactones are substantially non‐toxic to houseflies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crombie et al. (1951) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: