The sensitivity S of Si diodes generally increases with an increase in the instantaneous dose rate r of the radiation beam from clinical linear accelerators. A theoretical model is established to understand the physical origin of this dependence. During a radiation exposure, a portion of the excess minority carriers (electrons or holes) generated in the diode is captured by the R-G (recombination-generation) centers and is recombined with the majority carriers. The captured portion depends on the excess minority-carrier concentration delta p (proportional to r), the R-G center concentration N(t), and the minority-carrier capture cross-sections (sigma(n) for electrons and sigma(p) for holes) by the R-G center. When r increases, the R-G center concentration may not be sufficient to keep the recombination portion constant, which leads to an increase in diode sensitivity because a larger fraction of the charge will be collected. Larger majority-carrier concentration increases the recombination probability of the excess minority carriers and thus decreases the r dependence. The ratio of minority-carrier capture cross-sections, sigma(p)/sigma(n), influences the magnitude of the r dependence and also differentiates the r dependence between n-type and p-type diodes. A number of different circumstances can occur in diodes. When sigma(p) > sigma(n), such as for the dominant R-G center generated by electron radiation, the sensitivity is more dependent on r in an n-type diode than in a p-type diode if all the other device parameters are the same. When sigma(p) < sigma(n), the sensitivity is then more dependent on r in a p-type diode than in an n-type diode. The condition of sigma(p) < sigma(n) can occur when R-G centers with this property are generated by the foundry die process. A diode could have very small r dependence due to large R-G center concentration, generated by heavy platinum doping or radiation accumulated dose. Experimental data are compared with theory.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shi et al. (2003) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: