Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Nutrient uptake in streams is commonly quantified by uptake length ( S w ). Unlabeled nutrient addition experiments (steady plateau or pulse) are widely used because they are cost-effective, yet the standard analysis—linear regression of log-transformed, dilution-corrected concentrations—assumes first-order kinetics. That assumption breaks down under nutrient-saturated conditions and leads to biased estimates of S w . Using a one-dimensional advection framework coupled with Michaelis–Menten (M–M) uptake, we demonstrate analytically that the classical first-order approach can overestimate S w , particularly for pulse additions in which saturation is pronounced. We derive and evaluate an alternative, zero-order method that approximates M–M behavior when the substrate is non-limiting. Under nutrient-saturated conditions, the zero-order method yields S w estimates that are substantially closer to the M–M benchmark than the first-order method. Therefore, the zero-order approach should be adopted to estimate S w when the nutrient is not limiting. Furthermore, the new approach expands applicability to low-dispersion streams and improves inter-study comparability of stream nutrient retention metrics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: