Why the study?
Athletes aim for rapid, pain-free recovery after orthopedic surgery, and the choice of anesthesia affects postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction.
Does regional anesthesia improve postoperative rehabilitation, pain management, and quality of care compared to general anesthesia in athletes undergoing orthopedic surgery?
Does regional anesthesia improve postoperative rehabilitation, pain management, and quality of care compared to general anesthesia in athletes undergoing orthopedic surgery?
In athletes undergoing orthopedic surgery, regional anesthesia offers superior early pain control, reduced opioid consumption, and faster initial rehabilitation compared to general anesthesia.
Multiple factors guide anesthesia choice in athletes; leaves open optimal strategy pending higher-level trials.
Background: Athletes aim for rapid, pain-free return to activity after injury, but many of them require surgery. As the choice of anesthesia for surgery affects postoperative recovery and patient satisfaction it is crucial to analyze which type of anesthesia is adequate. Aim: This literature review was created to analyze the latest information on general versus regional anaesthesia on postoperative rehabilitation, pain management, length of hospital stay, and perceived quality of care in the context of orthopedic procedures in physically active patients. Materials and methods: The review analyzed current literature from Pubmed and other medical databases published between 2000 and 2025. Conclusion: A large number of factors must be taken into account when choosing what type of anaesthesia must be used. Patient collaboration, a holistic approach to the patient and understanding his needs influences the rehabilitation process and thus a faster return to health and physical activity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kudlińska et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: