Why the study?
Doppler echocardiography cannot reliably grade severity in patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction where the continuity equation is of no value.
Does 3D echocardiography improve the assessment of stenosis severity and anatomy compared to 2D echocardiography in patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction?
Does 3D echocardiography improve the assessment of stenosis severity and anatomy compared to 2D echocardiography in patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction?
3D echocardiography provides crucial anatomical details and accurate severity grading in complex, multilevel LVOT obstruction where standard 2D Doppler methods fall short.
BACKGROUND: Subaortic obstruction by a membrane or systolic anterior motion of the mitral valve leaflets is usually suspected in young patients, especially if the anatomy of the aortic valve is not clearly stenotic and unexplained left ventricular hypertrophy exists in the context of high transaortic gradients. MAIN BODY: In certain circumstances, some patients show both aortic and subaortic stenotic lesions of variable severity. Doppler echocardiography can help in grading severity in the case of single-level obstruction but not in patients with multilevel obstruction where the continuity equation is of no value. Three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography allows "en-face" visualization of each level of the aortic valve and subaortic tract; in addition, direct planimetry of the areas can be done using multiplanar reformatting. CONCLUSIONS: Accordingly, 3D echocardiography plays a crucial role in the assessment in patients with multilevel left ventricular outflow tract obstruction as it can accurately delineate the location and size, and severity of the stenosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abdelgawad et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: