Why the study?
Foot and mouth disease is an important livestock disease in Thailand with annual outbreaks, but the effects of control measures have received little research attention and epidemiological models had not been developed for Thailand.
Different areas require different approaches to control FMD outbreaks, with high-density areas requiring rigid measures like culling, while less stringent measures suffice in low-density areas.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Provides first stochastic FMD transmission model for Thailand; leaves open empirical validation before informing control policy.
Foot and mouth disease (FMD) is an important livestock disease in Thailand, with outbreaks occurring every year. However, the effects of FMD control measures in Thailand have received little research attention. Epidemiological models have been widely used to evaluate FMD outbreak control, but such a model has never been developed for Thailand. We constructed a stochastic between-farm transmission model to evaluate FMD control measures. The epidemiological unit of the model was the farm, which could be in different states: susceptible, latent, undetected infectious, detected infectious and recovered. The between-farm transmission was calculated by the sum of distance-dependent transmission and trade network transmission using parameters derived from FMD outbreaks in 2016-2017. We used this model to simulate the outbreaks with and without the implementation of the following control measures: culling all animals on infected farms, ring vaccination, animal movement restrictions and isolation of infected farms. The control measures were evaluated by estimating the number of secondarily infected farms and the outbreak duration for each scenario. The model was simulated in two study areas located in the Lamphaya Klang subdistrict (high farm density) and the Bo Phloi district (low farm density). The effects of control measures differed between the two study areas. When farm density was high, rigid control measures were required to prevent a major outbreak. Among all options, culling the animals on infected farms resulted in the lowest number of infected farms and the shortest outbreak duration. In contrast, for an area with a low farm density, less stringent control measures were sufficient to control the usually minor outbreaks. The results indicate that different areas require a different approach to control an outbreak of FMD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chanchaidechachai et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: