Why the study?
Does living in rural versus urban areas affect the prevalence of hypertension and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors among individuals over 40 years of age in Turkey?
Does living in rural versus urban areas affect the prevalence of hypertension and awareness of cardiovascular risk factors among individuals over 40 years of age in Turkey?
Hypertension prevalence is high in both rural and urban areas in Turkey, but awareness of cardiovascular risk factors is higher in urban areas, highlighting the need for comprehensive control programs.
Rural-urban hypertension gaps and awareness disparities in Turkey may guide screening; cross-sectional data leaves open intervention effects.
This study aims to establish the rates of hypertension among individuals living in rural and urban areas in Turkey, and to compare their level of awareness concerning cardiovascular disease risk factors and lifestyle modifications. In total, 1679 people from urban areas and 1321 individuals from rural areas who were over 40 years of age were contacted. Hypertension standardized prevalence rate was 49% in males and 51.3% in females living in urban areas, and 55.3% in males and 59.6% in females living in rural areas. The risk of hypertension was higher in those people living in urban areas with a smoking habit, obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, inappropriate salt intake or a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia. The risk of hypertension was also higher in people living in rural areas with obesity, a sedentary lifestyle, an inappropriate consumption of fat and red meat or a diagnosis of hypercholesterolemia or diabetes. Awareness of the importance of all of the included cardiovascular risk factors and protection from those risk factors was higher in urban areas. We concluded that cardiovascular risk factor control programs should be conducted together with hypertension control programs in rural and urban areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Metintaş et al. (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: