Why the study?
Does the use of computerized dosing support software (CDSS) lead to consistent oral anticoagulant management decisions across different centres?
Does the use of computerized dosing support software (CDSS) lead to consistent oral anticoagulant management decisions across different centres?
There is large variation in oral anticoagulant management decisions for complex scenarios across UK centres, highlighting the need for standardized education and national guidelines.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Substantial variations in complex anticoagulant dosing across centers warrant caution with CDSS; leaves open standardization via national guidelines.
INTRODUCTION: The quality of anticoagulation management is not readily or frequently assessed, particularly between different centres. This study sought to evaluate agreement in oral anticoagulant management decisions between participating centres in UK NEQAS programmes. METHODS: Participants were asked to indicate whether they used computerized dosing support software (CDSS) and to complete a series of questions with respect to anticoagulant management provision. Four clinical scenarios were provided, together with past and current International Normalised Ratio (INR) results. Participants were asked to provide recommendations on the target INR they would assign to the patient, the dose of warfarin and a recall interval. RESULTS: Seven hundred and fifty-nine centres returned results, of which 28% were enrolled in the hospital-based EQA programme, and 72% were participants in the point-of-care testing programme. Six hundred (79%) reported use of CDSS. In one straightforward scenario, there was 99% agreement in dose recommendation. However, for three more complex scenarios, differences were apparent in target INRs employed and both dose and recall recommendations. In some cases, differences related to the software system employed. CONCLUSION: The study emphasizes large variation in the approach to managing these scenarios and warrants further investigation, together with education including promoting national guidelines for the assignment of target ranges.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jennings et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: