What question did this study set out to answer?

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable versus non-resorbable devices in guided tissue regeneration (GTR).

Guided Tissue Regeneration Using Bioresorbable and Non‐Resorbable Devices: Initial Healing and Long‐Term Results

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

Randomized trial evaluates healing outcomes in periodontal therapy, suggesting new device options for improved results.

This research aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of bioresorbable versus non-resorbable devices in guided tissue regeneration (GTR).
Comparison of bioresorbable and non-resorbable devices in clinical and animal studies.
Assessment of long-term results and initial healing outcomes following GTR procedures.
Evaluation of safety and efficacy criteria for the devices used.
Bioresorbable devices showed favorable initial healing outcomes compared to non-resorbable devices.
Long-term maintenance of periodontal improvements was noted with bioresorbable device use.
Safety criteria met for both types of devices, suggesting viable options for GTR.

Jan Gottlow (1993) studied this question.

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark