Why the study?
Do electrocardiographic signs like RBBB and isolated negative T-wave correlate with higher shunt volume (Qp/Qs) in children with atrial septal defects?
Do electrocardiographic signs like RBBB and isolated negative T-wave correlate with higher shunt volume (Qp/Qs) in children with atrial septal defects?
In children with atrial septal defects, the presence of right bundle branch block and isolated negative T-waves on ECG correlates with a higher magnitude of intracardiac shunt.
ECG signs should not yet guide ASD decisions in children; leaves open their utility for shunt prediction in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine whether electrocardiographic signs correlate with hemodynamics and the magnitude of the intracardiac shunt in children with ostium secundum atrial septal defects (ASD). METHODS: A total of 100 ASD patients (median age, 6 years 4 months; 54 girls) underwent cardiac catheterization between August 1980 and April 2010. We retrospectively investigated the relationship between electrocardiographic signs and the pulmonary/systemic blood flow ratio (Qp/Qs) in these patients. We also compared 63 postoperative electrocardiograms with those recorded before surgery. RESULTS: The mean Qp/Qs ratio of the 100 patients was 2.46 ± 0.81 (range, 1.1-5.0). The Qp/Qs ratio in patients with and without right bundle branch block (RBBB) was 2.57 ± 0.82 (n = 73) and 2.15 ± 0.72 (n = 27), respectively (P = 0.016). The Qp/Qs ratio in patients with and without isolated negative T-wave was 2.85 ± 0.87 (n = 38) and 2.22 ± 0.68 (n = 62), respectively (P = 0.0003). None of the patients with low Qp/Qs ratio (Qp/Qs ratio ≤ 1.5) had both RBBB and isolated negative T-wave. The prevalence of these two signs decreased from 73.0% (n = 46) and 36.5% (n = 23) to 15.9% (n = 10) and 15.9% (n = 10) after surgical repair, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: RBBB and isolated negative T-wave in the precordial leads are well correlated with high Qp/Qs ratio in ASD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Somura et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: