Why the study?
Does enalapril improve clinical outcomes in children with heart failure secondary to congenital and acquired heart disease?
Does enalapril improve clinical outcomes in children with heart failure secondary to congenital and acquired heart disease?
Enalapril is clinically safe and effective for children with heart failure from ventricular impairment, valvar regurgitation, or post-surgery, but carries a significant risk of renal failure in young infants with left-to-right shunts.
Should not yet change practice for enalapril in pediatric heart failure; hypothesis-generating for randomized confirmation.
In a tertiary referral centre 63 patients underwent 67 treatment periods with enalapril. The median age was 5.4 months. All children had signs of heart failure: congestive cardiac failure with breathlessness at rest was present in 88%. Haemodynamic groups were left-to-right shunt (n = 15), impaired ventricular function (n = 14), after cardiac surgery (n = 23), valvar regurgitation (n = 12), and hypertension (n = 3). Serial clinical, radiological, and laboratory data were used to judge outcome. The mean (SD) maximal dose was 0.30 (0.21) mg/kg/day. Thirty nine (58%) patients improved, 20 (30%) showed no improvement, and eight (12%) had side effects requiring discontinuation of enalapril. Renal failure in eight patients was related to young age, low weight, and left-to-right shunt group. Three patients died in congestive heart failure with renal failure. Enalapril was clinically safe and effective for children with cardiac failure secondary to ventricular impairment, valvar regurgitation, or after cardiac surgery. Renal failure was a problem in young infants with left-to-right shunts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Leversha et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: