Why the study?
Does MRI improve the detection of spinal cord abnormalities compared to CT-myelography in patients with spontaneous spinal cord infarction?
Does MRI improve the detection of spinal cord abnormalities compared to CT-myelography in patients with spontaneous spinal cord infarction?
MRI is superior to CT-myelography for detecting spontaneous spinal cord infarctions.
May support MRI preference for suspected spinal cord infarction; hypothesis-generating and requires larger validation studies.
Magnetic resonance imaging was utilized to evaluate three women, one of whom was pregnant, with a clinical diagnosis of anterior spinal artery syndrome. In each case, development of spinal cord infarctions was spontaneous. Sagittal and axial MR images of the spine were obtained prior to and following administration of Gd-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid. Magnetic resonance showed no cord enlargement or signal abnormality on T1-weighted images prior to contrast medium administration. On T2-weighted images there was abnormal increase in signal intensity in the cord at levels corresponding to the neurologic deficits in all three patients. Variable contrast enhancement was demonstrated in these areas. Magnetic resonance imaging was positive, whereas CT-myelography, carried out in the two nonpregnant women, failed to demonstrate any abnormalities.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elksnis et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: