Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to analyse the peak CT number (PEAK) in CT number histogram of ground-glass nodules (GGN), meaning the most frequent density of pixels in the image of pulmonary nodule, based on three-dimensional (3D) reconstructive model pre-operatively, and the mean rate of PEAK change (V-PEAK) during a follow-up of GGN for differential diagnosis between pre-invasive adenocarcinoma (PIA) and invasive adenocarcinoma (IAC). METHODS: CT number histogram of pixels in GGN was made automatically by 3D measurement software. Diameter, total volume, PEAK and V-PEAK were measured from CT data sets of different groups classified by pathology, subtype and number of GGN, respectively. RESULTS: Among all 102 cases, 47 were PIA, including atypical adenomatous hyperplasia (n = 29) and adenocarcinoma in situ (n = 18), and 55 were IAC, including minimally IAC (MIA, n = 4). By Wilcoxon test, PEAK of IAC was significantly higher than that of PIA (p < 0.001). By receiver operating curve analysis, area under the curve (AUC) was 0.857 and threshold -820.50 Hounsfield units (HU) for differentiation between PIA and IAC. V-PEAK of IAC was unexpectedly remarkably smaller than that of PIA (p < 0.001) with AUC and threshold being 0.810 and -0.829 HU day(-1), respectively. CONCLUSION: Pre-operative PEAK and V-PEAK, which interpret and evaluate the change of volume and density of pulmonary nodule simultaneously from both exterior and interior perspectives, can help to distinguish IAC from PIA. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provided researchers of GGN another perspective, taking both volume and density of nodules into consideration for pathological evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peng et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: