Why the study?
Recent methodological advances have emerged for diagnosing inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy, highlighting the need to review these diagnostic techniques and etiology-orientated treatments across clinical scenarios.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy requires endomyocardial biopsy for etiological diagnosis to enable targeted treatments like immunosuppression or antiviral/IVIg therapy.
Inflammatory dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMi) is a syndrome, not an etiological disease entity. The infective etiology and the immunopathology can be best determined through endomyocardial biopsy with a complete work-up by light microscopy, immunohistology, and polymerase chain reaction for microbial agents. This review focuses on the methodological advances in diagnosis in the past few years and exemplifies the importance of an etiology-orientated treatment in different case scenarios. In fulminant nonviral myocarditis, immunosuppressive treatment together with hemodynamic stabilization of the patient via mechanical circulatory support (e.g., microaxial pumps, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, left ventricular assist device) can be life-saving. For viral inflammatory cardiomyopathy, intravenous immunoglobulin treatment can resolve inflammation and often eradicate the virus.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maisch et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: