Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental study demonstrates superior signal-to-noise ratios for solid dry electrodes during stationary and motion ECG monitoring, highlighting platinum and stainless steel for wearables.
Wearable long-term monitoring applications are becoming more and more popular in both the consumer and the medical market. In wearable ECG monitoring, the data quality depends on the properties of the electrodes and on how they contact the skin. Dry electrodes do not require any action from the user. They usually do not irritate the skin, and they provide sufficiently high-quality data for ECG monitoring purposes during low-intensity user activity. We investigated prospective motion artifact–resistant dry electrode materials for wearable ECG monitoring. The tested materials were 1) porous: a conductive polymer, conductive silver fabric; and 2) solid: stainless steel, silver, and platinum. ECG was acquired from test subjects in a 10-minute continuous settling test and in a 48-hour intermittent long-term test. In the settling test, the electrodes were stationary, whereas both stationary and controlled motion artifact tests were included in the long-term test. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was used as a figure of merit to quantify the results. The SNR of all electrode types increased during the settling test. In the long-term test, the SNR was generally elevated further. The introduction of electrode movement reduced the SNR markedly. Solid electrodes had a higher SNR than porous electrodes. In the stationary testing, stainless steel showed the highest SNR, followed by platinum, silver, conductive polymer, and conductive fabric. In the movement testing, the order was platinum, stainless steel, silver, conductive polymer, and conductive fabric.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joutsen et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: