Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The author used confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to model self-regulation subprocesses as latent concepts in an examination of the effectiveness of peer modeling for teaching self-regulation. The design was a nonequivalent pretestposttest control group design with 63 participants (52 women and 11 men). The experimental group received self-regulation training through a self-regulation videotape and a peer-advocated action plan. The control group received no training. Difference scores were calculated for both groups and analyzed with analysis of variance. The author used a 50-item Likert-type Self-Regulation Inventory (SRI) as a pretest and posttest to measure participants' self-regulatory attitudes and behaviors. The experimental group performed significantly better than the control group. The author used CFA to test the goodness of fit between a hypothesized model of self-regulation and the sample data. On the basis of a priori specification of the CFA model, the author predicted that responses to the SRI could be explained by 7 1st-order factors (Help-Seeking, Study Strategies, Self-Motivation, Self-Evaluation, Self-Efficacy, Managing Distractions, and Self-Monitoring) and 1 2nd-order factor of Self-Regulation. The results of the CFA indicated adequate goodness of fit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Carolyn Orange (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: